Posts Tagged ‘medical marijuana’

Does Cannabis Truly Help AIDS Patients

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Medical Cannabis:AIDS Patients in a Controlled Study Had Significant Pain Relief… AIDS patients suffering from debilitating nerve pain got as much or more relief by somking cannabis as they would typically get from prescription drugs — and with fewer side effects — according to a study conducted under rigorously controlled conditions with government-grown pot.

In a five-day study performed in a specially ventilated hospital ward where marijuana patients smoked three marijuana cigarettes a day, more than half the participants tallied significant reductions in pain.

By contrast, less than one-quarter of those who smoked “placebo” medical marijuana, which had its primary psychoactive ingredients removed, reported benefits, as measured by subjective pain reports and standardized neurological tests.

After writing articles recently on Morphine and prescription drugs used and abused as pain killers, I believe Marijuana is a better alternative. I do not have any personal experience with marijuana used for pain relief, but I was friends with a man whose wife used it before she died of complications from kidney failure.

His young wife first developed diabetes, then a heart attack. The medicine given to her for the heart attack killed her kidneys. She then had to endure dialysis three times a day at home. At the end she was nearly blind, and most of her body had stopped working. She was not even 45. He told me how much marijuana had helped her cope with the nausea, pain, and symptoms of her declining health. They did not get it legally, but from a friend who grew it out in the Colorado mountains. If it helped her with the debilitating disease pain, and made life tolerable, why did she have to obtain Marijuana illegally?

Morphine, OxyCotin, and other more dangerous pain killers are given to patients everyday. I think marijuana is probably less toxic, cheaper and safer. You don't inject marijuana either which prevents aids transmission and blown veins. According to physicians, it is very effective in treating the pain and nausea of AIDS, cancer patients, and other diseases such as multiple sclerosis.

There are many doctors both in favor and against using marijuana as a pain killer. I read a lot of research on the problems, addictions, and black market use of Morphine, Heroin, and OxyContin which are all opium derived. The drugs listed above are prescribed by current doctors to treat pain. I believe Marijuana is a safer alternative pain treatment.

Among the pro comments I read during my research, here is one from Lester Grinspoon, MD, Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, who stated in his article “The Medical Marijuana Problem,” published in Cannabis Health in Mar./Apr. 2006:”There are many thousands of patients who currently use cannabis as a medicine…There is no question about its safety. It is one of humanity's oldest medicines, used for thousands of years by millions of people, with very little evidence of significant toxic effects. More is known about its adverse effects than about those of most prescription drugs.”

According to a number of research reports on the use of medical marijuana, it has the least withdrawal symptoms of currently used pain killing prescription drugs, even in higher dosages. There are less dependence issues according to the research, and it is more easily tolerated by most patients. I feel patients should use it with the supervision of a doctor who is monitoring their overall disease and its symptoms. I think it should be legalized and regulated, so patients get a pure product. I feel it is a much better alternative to morphine, heroin, and OxyCotin where the drug overdose death rate is sky rocketing.

Deaths from opioid drugs such as morphine, heroin and OxyCotin tripled from 4000 in 1999 to 13,000 in 2006. Forty per cent of all poisoning deaths in the US in 2006 were caused from the abuse of opioid painkillers. These figures do not take into account the problem in black market drug traffic, hepatitis and AIDs transmission from used syringes.

Marijuana is not injected which is an advantage in regards to AIDS transmission and there are few deaths caused by the use of Marijuana. This does not mean its usage does not come without side effects. Still in my opinion, Marijuana should be legalized for use in pain management in certain diseases and to relieve dying patients. Visit the website below for some very excellent pros and cons on this subject, then make up your own mind.

References:

Pro-con.org on marijuana use: http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/viewresource.asp?resourceID=000141

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxycodone

http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/viewresource.asp?resourceID=000141

WebMD Medical Reference: “Opioid Analgesics for Chronic Pain.”
Hall, A.J., Journal of the American Medical Association, Dec. 10, 2008; vol 300: pp 2613-2620.

marijuana march 2009 by yoshiisland

Marijuana Price Drop Hype… Or Scare Tactics?

Friday, July 9th, 2010

It seems that some are very concerned that a vote that would legalize Cannabis in California might also upset supply and demand that Medical Cannabis values could plunge by as much as 90 % and perhaps challenge the tax bonus that marijuana supporters have used to sell the proposal, a study in print Wednesday found.

An intensive study by the independent RAND Drug Policy Research Center projects some attention-grabbing possibilities if Ca in Nov becomes the second state, after Alaska, to legalize cannabis for entertaining use by adults and the first to tax commercial marijuana sales sales. Do you think marijuana should remain medical

Rand Researchers are stating Cannabis prices may well plunge from $375 an oz., within the state's present medical marijuana regulation to less than $38 per oz. prior to taxes.

Something that seems to be getting more and more attention in today's society is the legalization of marijuana. In this article I will discuss the reasons that Marijuana should be legalized in not only the United States but everywhere else it is illegal too.

Often groups that campaign to keep marijuana illegal use the statement that marijuana is a gateway drug, otherwise meaning that it could lead to the use of other, more potent or dangerous drugs. Now take note that I said marijuana opponents use the statement that marijuana is a gateway drug. There is a large amount of conflicting information in this area; numerous studies have found that marijuana could be a gateway drug where others have found that marijuana is not a gateway drug. There may be a logical explanation for marijuana being a possible gateway drug when someone purchases marijuana there is the possibility that other harder and more dangerous drugs may be available and the buyer may be pressured into buying other substances. Along with other drugs possibly being available someone may be around other people that are using marijuana and be pushed into using other substances through peer pressure. If marijuana were to be legalized it would be available to purchase where other illegal substances are not available.

Another argument against the legalization of marijuana is that if marijuana were legal people will drive themselves into poverty because of the price of the substance. Now assuming that marijuana prices remained at what they are right now that would be very possible, however if marijuana were legal the price would almost be guaranteed to drop. One needs look no further than prohibition to see this principal at work, when the sale or transport of alcohol was made illegal prices skyrocketed. The price of beer during the prohibition era rose about 700% if this same factor were applied to marijuana today the price would drop substantially. According to one of my friends, in my area the price for an ounce of marijuana will run about $400-500, if the price dropped by 700% an ounce would cost about $65, and that would be enough to keep one person constantly stoned for quite a while. It is estimated that in 1990 US consumers spent $9 billion on marijuana, with inflation this could easily be over $12-15 billion now. That is $12-15 billion that is not being put back into our economy. Now with a 700% drop in price that is about $2 billion that could be put back into our economy instead of Mexico. Better yet, assuming that the government had a huge tax on it, all of that could be put into government programs or even used for tax cuts.

One common problem with anything illegal is that there is a black market for the items. Unlike the free market the black market cannot be regulated to control inflation and validity of transactions. The only way to control the black market is through violence, which is why drug related crime is common. There is no doubt about it that drug related crime is impossible to stop but it can be reduced. With the legalization of marijuana there is a good possibility that drug related crime could drop due to the ability to purchase it on the free market not having to deal with dealers that will take your cash and shoot you on site so that they can take their business elsewhere. Not to mention that bank robberies could possibly be reduced because of people robbing them to obtain drug money, with reduced prices there would be less of a need to do so.

One major argument for at the very least decriminalization of marijuana is medical purposes. Opponents to this argument say that marijuana has no medical use and that marijuana causes more damage than it helps. This is a half-truth, true marijuana can cause damage to brain cells but that is when it is used in extreme excess, however it can also be extremely useful to people on chemotherapy. It does this by calming nausea that is induced by chemotherapy. It can also be used as a mild painkiller, similar to the effect of aspirin or ibuprofen; it can also be used to stimulate appetite, treat glaucoma and has a relaxing or calming effect on the user.

Marijuana may also be one of the safest drugs around. Nicotine and Ethanol have absolutely no health benefit at all but they are legal, and widely abused drugs. The active ingredient in marijuana, THC (Tetrahydrocannabinol) is probably the safest of all three.

NOTE: LD50 level is the level at which a substance will kill 50% of the tested population.

The LD50 level of Nicotine, the active ingredient in tobacco, is 9.2 mg/kg in a dog.
The LD50 level of Grain Alcohol is 5500 mg/kg in a dog.
The LD50 level of THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, is 525 mg/kg in a dog.

According to this a domestic dog would have to consume nearly 1/3lb of pure THC to kill it. And at a 15% THC level in marijuana that results to consuming about 2.2lbs of marijuana.

Not to mention that marijuana can be consumed in a safer manner than nicotine or alcohol. When one uses a tobacco product in any way you are exposing yourself to cancer-causing carcinogens. When drinking alcohol you are putting yourself at risk for alcohol poisoning and liver damage. Marijuana can be consumed in several ways where each has a different possible health effect. Smoking marijuana is basically the same as smoking a cigarette, using a bong or vaporizer reduces the carcinogens that your body s exposed to. However there is one way to use marijuana that exposes your body to as little danger as possible, baking the marijuana into a lipid (fat) releases the THC in a safe non carcinogenic way.

In order for marijuana to be legalized and still be controlled several restrictions would have to be placed on the sale and production of it.

1) You must be 20 or older to purchase marijuana.

2) The sale of marijuana would be restricted to government-approved businesses.

3) Marijuana may only be consumed in private due to the effects that the smoke may have on people that do not wish to be exposed to it.

4) Import or massive private production of marijuana would be illegal to prevent lower prices on the black market to allow better control over the substance. Breaking this restriction would have massive charges attached to it, similar to what is in effect today.

5) Small scale private production of marijuana would be legal but it must be strictly for private use and may not exceed 'x' size of plant/garden etc.

6) Driving stoned would carry a penalty similar to DUI, with a suspension of your license and possibly jail time for endangering the lives of other people.

7) Those in the medical business or any other business that people's lives depend on should be forbidden to use marijuana, we can't have people doing brain surgery high.

Following the above steps Marijuana could be legalized and be just as controlled as it is now only without the going to jail for having a plant part.

medical marijuana (explored) by KingoftheHill.

Medical Marijuana And AIDS

Monday, July 5th, 2010

Medical Marijuana:AIDS Patients in a Controlled Study Had Significant Pain Relief… AIDS patients suffering from debilitating nerve pain got as much or more relief by somking cannabis as they would typically get from prescription drugs — and with fewer side effects — according to a study conducted under rigorously controlled conditions with government-grown pot.

In a five-day study performed in a specially ventilated hospital ward where marijuana patients smoked three marijuana cigarettes a day, more than half the participants tallied significant reductions in pain.

By contrast, less than one-quarter of those who smoked “placebo” medical marijuana, which had its primary psychoactive ingredients removed, reported benefits, as measured by subjective pain reports and standardized neurological tests.

Marijuana Legalization is one of the most debated issues of the twenty first century. Use of the plant even dates back “further than 7,000 B.C. and was legal as recently as when Ronald Regan was a boy…” (Guither). The drug is the most commonly used illicit substance around the world and there are numerous slang terms for the plant such as cannabis, reefer, mary jane, weed, etc. Most Americans are familiar with the anti-marijuana commercials and the side effects of smoking pot as well as seeing athletes and celebrities reprimanded for the legal use and sale of cannabis. However, according to NORML (”The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws”) in 2008 “more than 80 million Americans admit that they have smoked in the past year.” This is a very large number considering how much money the United States government spends on advertising for the war against drugs. Many people agree that the drug is no more dangerous than the use of any other legal drugs such as the consumption of alcohol or cigarette smoking. For this reason, marijuana should be decriminalized and available to the public while regulated as cigarettes and alcohol.

The most obvious reason for a number of Americans to avoid marijuana is the belief that it is morally unethical. Jobs, that do drug testing, make it clear that it is not socially acceptable in the work place and that it will not be tolerated. Most Christians especially do not approve of smoking pot. Ironically, the Rastafarian religion has found numerous references to pot in the bible. For example, “…thou shalt eat the herb of the land (exodus 10:12)” (”BBC”).Though all religions vary in teachings, in general American parents are concerned that legalizing Marijuana sends the wrong message to children. Which is a good indication that most American parents of teenagers do not realize that “47% of high school students have tried marijuana” (Leachman 2). In 1936, “Reefer Madness”, a propaganda film framed as a documentary, warned parents and children of the dangers of the marijuana. The film was a far cry from reality and showed very unrealistic “scenes of high school kids smoking pot and quickly going insane, playing 'evil' jazz music, being committed, and going on a murder spree” (Murphy 1). “Reefer Madness” is now a musical and has been used for entertainment purposes because of its outdated and exaggerated views on marijuana.

For many people, marijuana is what is referred to as a gateway drug, or a seemingly harmless substance which may cause more serious addictions in the future. Joseph A. Califano says that “teens who drank, smoked cigarettes, and used marijuana at least once in the past month are more than 16 times as likely to use another drug like cocaine, heroin ,or LSD”(33) which are all very serious illicit drugs which can lead to severe health and legal consequences. For most of the American population it is considered to be common knowledge that marijuana is what gets people hooked on harder drugs. Despite this assumption, some believe that marijuana is not the cause at all and that most drug addicts begin substance abuse with legal drugs such as alcohol or cigarettes. According to the Institute of Medicine “ecause it is the most widely used illicit drug, marijuana is predictably the first illicit drug that most people encounter. Not surprisingly, most users do not begin with marijuana- they begin with alcohol and nicotine, usually when they are too young to do so legally”(36) It is understandable that”[people who enjoy the effects of marijuana are, logically, more likely to be willing to try other mood-altering drugs than are people who are not willing to try marijuana or who dislike its effects”(The Institute of Medicine 37).The Institute of Medicine also states that “illions of Americans have tried marijuana, but are not regular users. In 1996, 68.6 million people-32% of the U.S. population over 12 years old-had tried marijuana or hashish at least once in their life time, but only 5% were current users”(35). This does not mean that marijuana does not contribute to the amount of people who try hard drugs or become addicted to them. “Most people who smoke pot do not move on to other drugs, but then only 5% to 7% of cigarette smokers get lung cancer”, the lesson is that young people “who smoke pot are at vastly greater risk of moving on to harder drugs”(Califano 33). It would be easy to blame marijuana for drug dependency in America, but drugs that are legal in the U.S. are at fault as much or more because of their availability to the public.

For most educated Americans, it is known that marijuana has several harmful side effects. Health risks include memory loss, gum disease, lung and respiratory problems, and several mental health conditions that could become detrimental to a person's well-being. The most argued health issue is weather or not the drug is addictive. According to Tim Anderson “any people use marijuana compulsively even though it interferes with family, school, work and recreational activities” (226). Alcohol and nicotine are both legal drugs which are proven to be addictive and cause serious problems in the lives of people who become addictive. Why should the fact that marijuana is addictive keep it from being legalized when two other addictive substances are legally sold to the public? Alcohol can lead to the same poor choices as marijuana, such as unprotected sexual activity, neglect of responsibilities, or driving while impaired. Alcohol and nicotine are both proven to have as serious health consequences as marijuana. The Office of National Drug Control Policy states that “people who use marijuana on a regular basis often have the same breathing problems as tobacco users, such as chronic coughing and wheezing, more frequent acute chest illnesses, and a tendency toward obstructed airways”(228). More disconcerting than the physical health issues would be the mental health problems which may follow such as difficulty in “memory loss, distorted perception, trouble with thinking and problem solving, and anxiety” (Office of National Drug Control Policy 226).Regular marijuana users have also been shown to have double the chance of suffering from depression and anxiety, panic attacks, or thoughts of suicide later in life (ONDCP 226, “Drug Facts: Marijuana” 1). Alcohol is a depressant; these same effects hold true for alcoholics. “Is marijuana addictive? Yes, can be, in that some people use it to excess, in ways that are problematic for themselves and those around them, and find it hard to stop. But marijuana may very well be the least addictive and least damaging of all commonly used psychoactive drugs, including many that are now legal. Most people who smoke marijuana never become dependant. Withdrawal symptoms pale compared with those from other drugs. No one has ever died from a marijuana overdose, which cannot be said for most other drugs. Marijuana is not associated with violent behavior and only minimally with reckless sexual behavior, and even heavy marijuana smokers smoke only a fraction of what cigarette addicts smoke. Lung cancers involving marijuana are rare” (Nadelmann 215).

The point is any substance, weather its caffeine or prescription drugs, can be abused and become addictive and harmful to a person, this should not mean that marijuana in particular should be illegal. Instead, marijuana should be legalized and regulated in the same way as alcohol and nicotine.

The first and possibly most essential reason for marijuana decriminalization is the many medical uses for the drug. A number of people with terminating illnesses have found relief from the use of marijuana. AIDS patients have shown an increase in appetite, as well as “cancer patients often smoke marijuana to battle the nausea caused by chemotherapy” (Rich 1). According to Ted Gottfried “arijuana has been effective in treating Glaucoma, a condition resulting from a pressure in the eyes, which the drug eases” the patient's pain (20). Marijuana can be used for medicinal purposes and can be beneficial to society but it is illegal, alcohol and nicotine are not effective as medicine for any diseases however they are both legal to the public. To supporters of marijuana legalization it is obvious why it should be legalized if only for medical use. The main concern for most patients would be the adverse affects of smoking marijuana may be more detrimental than the symptoms that the drug is meant to relieve. Luckily, less invasive ways to use the drug for medicine have been developed: “Pharmaceutical products containing marijuana's central ingredient, THC, are legally sold in the U.S., and more are emerging. Some people find the pill form satisfactory, and others consume it in teas or baked products” (Nadelmann 215). Even if patients decide smoke instead of one of the newer techniques, the effects on the person's health are minimal compared to the disease which it is helping to treat, especially since most of the diseases are fatal and incurable at this point in time.

Unlike cigarettes, marijuana has absolutely no harmful chemicals added before it is sold and smoked. For this reason alone pot is less likely to lead to cancer or lung problems. Lung cancer from the smoking of marijuana is rare and the use of tobacco is much more likely to result in respiratory complications and gum disease. In general, heavy users of marijuana still do not smoke as much as people who smoke cigarettes. Marijuana's health risks are significantly mild compared to legal substances and hard drugs. Infact many of the health risks are exaggerated or not sufficiently supported by scientific evidence: “In 1972, after reviewing the scientific evidence, the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse concluded that while marijuana was not entirely safe, its dangers had been grossly overstated. Since then, researchers have conducted thousands of studies of humans, animals, and cell cultures. None reveal any findings dramatically different from those described by the National Commission in 1972. In 1995, based on thirty years of scientific research editors of the British medical journal Lancet concluded that “the smoking of cannabis, even long term, is not harmful to health” (”Myths and Facts about Marijuana”1).

Some researchers will argue that the effects of marijuana are clearly visible regardless of scientific proof. The idea that marijuana leads to brain damage, has yet to be anything more than a theory. Scientists continue the study of the effects of marijuana on animals and humans:”None of the medical tests currently used to detect brain damage in humans have found harm from marijuana, even from long term high-dose use. An early study reported brain damage in rhesus monkeys after six months exposure to high concentrations of marijuana smoke. In a recent, more carefully conducted study, researchers found no evidence of brain abnormality in monkeys that were forced to inhale the equivalent of four to five marijuana cigarettes every day for a year. The claim that marijuana kills brain cells is based on a speculative report dating back a quarter of a century that has never been supported by any scientific study”(”Myths and Facts about Marijuana” 2).Though marijuana smoke is not necessarily a healthy habit, it is not any more harmful than the legal drugs that are being used everyday in the U.S.

Legalizing marijuana would not increase the number of people who abuse the drug; because it would be less taboo and not as thrilling if it is legal. When drugs are prohibited in America or in neighboring countries, use of the drug is actually increased. As determined by Dan Gardner, “he most frightening jumps in drug use the world has seen have happened after the introduction -or escalation- of drug prohibition” (132). He also believes that “tates with higher rates of drug incarceration experience higher rates of drug use” (133). If that is true, keeping marijuana illegal is counter productive to the fight against drug use in America. Legalization would cut down on the number of people in jail for marijuana related crimes. Instead of police chasing people, who may be illegally dealing drugs or in possession of marijuana, they can focus on catching criminals who are guilty of rape, burglary, or murder. Also if the number of people in jail were reduced tax payer's money would not be wasted and marijuana users could be productive members of society. According to District Attorney, Paul Gallegos, legalization of the drug “would probably reduce the value of marijuana pretty significantly, so we'd probably see a reduction if not a complete end to the ancillary crime associated with marijuana” (1). People who do not smoke pot now while it is illegal will most likely not start if it becomes legal due to religious beliefs or health concerns.

Economically, the legalization of marijuana could be beneficial to the U.S. because it could be taxed and regulated like tobacco. NORML states that currently “Californians consume $1-$2 billion worth of medical marijuana per year, enough to generate some $100 million in sales tax” (2) or approximately 1.3 billion dollars a year! The Economy in America is suffering and hemp could be a major export and beneficial cash crop. The use of hemp in clothing and other products has been around for thousands of years. Infact the first woven fabrics are believed to have been constructed from the plant's stalks (Guither 1). Of course, clothing is not the only industrial use of hemp; “over the centuries the plant was used for food, incense, cloth, rope, and much more” (Guither 1). According to Dan Stancliff California's sale of marijuana could lead the nation out of the recession if pot were legalized. The money would not only come from industrial use but also on “tourism picking up for the entire state, and especially for the Emerald Triangle, 'Green Tours' would have a new meaning, more importantly, legalizing marijuana would put an end to the Mexican cartels who infest our state and national forests with their huge destructive grows” (Stancliff 1). Presently, much of America's tax dollars are being spent on anti-drug programs and advertisements. Many supporters claim that “f drugs were decriminalized…much of the $50 billion spent annually by federal and state government agencies might be used in such critical areas as health care, education, low-cost housing, and programs to reduce dependency on drugs and alcohol”(Gottfried 68). The cost to enforce marijuana laws in the U.S. is an estimated $10-15 billion (Nadelmann 214). Most supporters of marijuana legalization agree with the opinion of Ethan A. Nadelmann:

“No drug is perfectly safe, and every psychoactive drug can be used in ways that are problematic, The federal government has spent billions of dollars on advertisements and anti-drug programs that preach the dangers of marijuana -that it's a gateway drug, and addictive in its own right, and dramatically more potent than it used to be, and responsible for all sorts of physical and social diseases as well as international terrorism. But the government has yet to repudiate the 1988 finding of the Drug Enforcement Administration's own administrative law judge, Frances Young. Who concluded after extensive testimony 'marijuana in its natural form is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man',” (Nadelmann 214).

Instead of spending American tax dollars on advertisements which people will ignore, that money could go toward improving the lives of the citizens.

In the United States, the possession of marijuana lands more that 700,000 people in jail every year (Nadelmann 214), most of which have no other criminal records. That means that the number of people arrested for marijuana related crimes is “almost as the same number as are arrested each year for cocaine, heroin, ecstasy, and all other illicit drugs combined” (Nadelmann 214). Clearly the U.S. government has overreacted and over the years this view has grown without many of the view-holders fully aware of the facts. In the some countries the use and sale of marijuana is legal and regulated as tobacco. For example, Amsterdam allows people to buy marijuana at coffee shops and the country does not seem to have a problem with abuse of the drug.

“Young people who smoke marijuana are to do so in coffee shops that openly sell the drug. There are rules governing these coffee shops. They are not allowed to sell alcohol or hard drugs. They may dispense no more than five grams of marijuana or hashish in any single transaction. Drugs may not be advertised. The shops must not cause any nuisance to local neighborhoods” (Gottfried 92).

Not all Americans agree that the same success with pot would happen in the U.S. Amsterdam and the other European countries, which do not prohibit the sale of marijuana, rely more on public transportation than most citizens of the United States. If pot were legal to the American public for personal use, laws prohibiting driving under the influence of marijuana should be enforced much like the laws regarding drinking and driving.

For a number of United States citizens that idea of marijuana legalization is a subject in which lies a lot of gray area. There are people who are totally against the idea, others who think that legalization is an imperative part of improving the quality of life in America, and many who are undecided on the matter. However, a plethora of American people who believe that marijuana should be legalized are vocal enough to gain national attention. Nadelmann states that “Marijuana Prohibition is unique among American criminal laws. No other law is both enforced so widely and harshly and yet deemed so unnecessary by such a substantial portion of the populace” (213). Many people disagree with the use of marijuana because of moral views but the same groups also disagree with tobacco and alcohol, both of which are not prohibited by law. Marijuana is no more dangerous than cigarettes or alcohol and therefore, should be legally treated as equals.

Above the Influence. “Drug Facts: Marijuana.” http:// www.abovetheinluence.com/facts/drugs-marijuana.aspx#. (2009)

Anderson, Tim. “Marijuana should be Decriminalized.” http: //www.themountaineeronline.com. (18 Nov 2008).

BBC. “Worship.” http: //www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/rastafaria/customs/customs_1.shtml.(18 Mar 2009).

Califano Jr., Joseph A. “Marijuana is a gateway drug.” Espejo, Roman. Drug Abuse. San Diego: Green Haven, 2002.

Drug Policy. “Myths and Facts about Marijuana.” http:// www.drugpolicy.org /marijuana/factsmyths /#harms. (2009).

Gardner, Dan. “Legalizing Drugs would not cause an increase in Drug Use.” Espejo, Roman. Drug Abuse. Green Haven: San Diego, 2002.

Gottfried, Ted. Should Drugs be Legalized? Brookfield: Twenty First Century, 2000.

Guither, Pete. “A Brief History of the Criminalization of Cannabis.” http:// Marijuana.drugwarrant.com. (2009).

The Institute of Medicine. “Marijuana Use does not lead to Harder Drugs.” Espejo, Roman. Drug Abuse. San Diego: Green Haven, 2002.

Leachman, Dr.Mackenzie. “Welcome to High School: What to Expect of your teenager through High School.” http://www.pld.fcps.net/welcom/htm. (19 Mar 2009).

Murphy, Kevin and Dan Studney. “Reefer Madness History.” http: //web. archive.org/web/20060328163232/ www.reefer=madness-movie.com/index.html. (2005).

Nadelmann, Ethan A. “An End to Marijuana Prohibition”. Goldberg, Raymond. Taking Sides: Drugs and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.

NORML. “NORML Statement on the Cultivation of Industrial Hemp.”http://www.norml.com/index.cfm? group_ID=5447. (11 Dec 2006).

Office of National Drug Control Policy. “Marijuana and the Truth behind 10 Popular Misperceptions.” Goldberg, Raymond. Taking Sides: Drugs and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.

Rich, Alex K. “Legalization of Marijuana: an overview.” Points of View: Legalization of Marijuana. http: //search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=puh&AN=23554883&site=pov-live. (Feb 2007).

Stancliff, Dan. “California can lead the nation out of this depression by legalizing Marijuana.” http:// www.times-standard.com/ci_11865538?source=most=viewed. (08 Mar 2009)

Tam, Donna.” Marijuana Legalization Supporters say Bill could save Billions.” http: //www.times- standard.com/localnews/ci_11865543. (08 Mar 2009).

marijuana-arrests by Yaooo

How Does Medical Marijuana React In The Body

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Well, first off, there are many active ingredients in Medical Marijuana, which is to say it is not a single drug molecule, such as alcohol or cocaine, rather a combination of more than 400 diverse chemical components. In fact, they're so different that 60 of them (called cannabinoids) are exclusive to marijuana.

While we're discussing numbers, let’s point out that the primary mind-altering cannabinoid is a little item by the name of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol, or “THC”, for short. It's this chemical that triggers marijuana's main drug reactions and in turn effects the body and the brain.

Tetrahydrocannabinol is a mind altering compound that breaks up into at least 80 different byproducts (or metabolites) prior to being eliminated from the body… Which can take a while.

The mood altering process starts as soon as the medical cannabis THC enters the bloodstream, and begins zeroing in on Cannabinoid receptors (anandamides) in the brain and the central nervous system.

Boston — Ballot Question 2 in Mass. is a hot button issue in the days leading up to the presidential election. The current Mass. law states that anyone caught with any amount of marijuana will be arrested and tried as a criminal defendant in a court of law. If Ballot Question 2 passes, people caught with less than one ounce of marijuana would be issued a ticket similar to a traffic violation.

The amount of the ticket will be $100 dollars and the fine would go to whatever city the offense took place in.The benefit of the fine, rather than the arrest, is that it will reduce the number of people with criminal records, cut court costs for cities and towns and not tie up the police with the arrest and booking of someone caught with marijuana.

I firmly believe the current marijuana policy needs to be replaced with civil citations. People who use marijuana pose far less risk to the general public than those who consume alcohol, but they face arrest and prosecution for using marijuana. Unfortunately, drug use brings forward the image of the crazed addict who will do anything for their fix, when in reality, many productive members of society use marijuana without any ill effects whatsoever. If Ballot Question 2 passes, minors caught with any amount of marijuana would face a stiffer penalty. Their parents would be notified, there would be a $1,000 fine, and they would be forced to attend a drug education program.

Opponents of the sensible marijuana policy claim that by passing this bill we would be sending the wrong message to kids about drug use. Opponents also argue that it will make it easier for drug dealers to ply their trade without fear of being caught. I believe that the message that children get in our society is not from the laws we pass, but by the actions of their parents. I would have to agree that it will be easier for the marijuana dealers to sell marijuana if this ballot question passes. However if as a society we are willing to say that smoking marijuana is only a civil offense then wouldn't the logical conclusion be that those adults are procuring their marijuana from somewhere? Since we are already aware of this fact then the argument that it will make marijuana dealers freer to sell pot is lacking. It will still be a criminal offense to sell other drugs.

This is a polarizing issue in Mass., and I will be watching closely to see how people feel about this. One local poll reported that more than 70 percent of adults agree that marijuana should be decriminalized. We'll see if those 70 percent feel strongly enough about it to go out and vote for the decriminalization of marijuana.

Souces: http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Massachusetts_Sensible_Marijuana_Policy_(2008)

Marijuana by hrdtail2007

Medical Marijuana States

Monday, June 21st, 2010

As emotions over medical marijuana and the locations, and numbers of the dispensaries allowed heats up in every city across the state of California… There is still no greater place to live. In one afternoon a properly documented marijuana patients can visit a marijuana doctor, be evaluated, and with 30 min be on his or her way looking for their new favorite medical cannabis club. Of which there are more than a few to choose from.

Marijuana is illegal, but should it be? That is a question that remains unanswered. The road to the illegalization of marijuana began in 1937 when the Marihuana Tax Act was passed. While it didn't make the drug illegal, it made it very dangerous to deal with the substance. It wasn't until the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 that marijuana became a schedule 1 narcotic, making it illegal. In order to be declared a schedule 1 narcotic, a substance must meet the following criteria:

(A) The drug or other substance has high potential for abuse.

(B) The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.

(C) There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision.

In this paper we will explore the function of drug laws, how that function relates to marijuana, and whether or not a law prohibiting marijuana is ethical and fair. In addition to the guidelines offered by the CSA, we will include our own reasons for controlling a substance, which are:

(A) The drug induces severe psychological affects, which cause unpredictable behavior that may endanger the user and those around them.

(B) Use of the drug could lead to crime.

(C) Use of the drug can lead to severe health problems.

The opposition to marijuana (in the modern day) stems largely from fears in regards to the possible psychological and physical health effects of the drug. Some claim that marijuana causes permanent damage to brain, hindering a person's cognitive skills over time. Others note personality changes such as loss of motivation, paranoia, and addiction.

Studies have shown the fears regarding personality to be justified. However, the general consensus is that the people most affected by marijuana in terms of addiction and personality changes, are people who began using the drug before the age of 18, a period in a child's life that is important to their psychological and social development. In fact, 10-14% of marijuana users suffer from addiction problems and withdrawal that is comparable to nicotine withdrawal, says University of Vermont associate professor and director of its Treatment Research Center, Dr. Alan J. Budney (Carroll).

According to the National Institute for Drug Abuse (NIDA) marijuana can have lasting effects on a user's daily life. The following is taken from NIDA's information page of marijuana:

Research clearly demonstrates that marijuana has the potential to cause problems in daily life or make a person's existing problems worse. In one study, heavy marijuana abusers reported that the drug impaired several important measures of life achievement including physical and mental health, cognitive abilities, social life, and career status. Several studies associate workers' marijuana smoking with increased absences, tardiness, accidents, workers' compensation claims, and job turnover.

As for physiological health effects, the three main concerns are in regards to the brain, the heart, and the lungs. As mentioned earlier, many opponents to marijuana use claim that the drug causes permanent damage to the brain. Many studies dispute this notion, but we will cover that in more depth when we get to the pro-marijuana portion of this paper. Instead, we will focus on the areas in which scientific studies have been able to confirm potential health risks.

Research has shown that the risk for a heart-attack increases within the first hour of marijuana use. This happens because of an increase in blood pressure and heart rate. In addition to heart concerns, marijuana poses a threat to the respiratory system as it is carcinogenic and users tend to hold smoke in their lungs longer. While it was originally believed that marijuana smoke caused cancer new studies have proven otherwise, some even saying that the active ingredient in cannabis, THC, may be able to help prevent certain kinds of cancer (NIDA).

Nevertheless, the debate on medicinal marijuana has caused an increase in the amount of research regarding the drug, many of which have ended with surprising conclusions. In 15 different studies, varying from 3 months to 13+ years, scientists observed regular marijuana users and non-users to determine if there was any damage to the brain as a result of use. All of the studies conclusively proved that marijuana does not damage the brain permanently as previously believed. Other studies have produced similar results (WebMD).

Igor Grant, MD and lead researcher for the previously mentioned studies makes sure to mention that the participants were all adults and that the results would most likely be different if it was a 12 year old user, whose nervous system is still developing (WebMD).

In regards to addiction, ''Everything is relative,'' said Dr. Donald Jasinksi, a professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins medical school and director of the Center for Chemical Dependence at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center. ''Does it destroy as many lives as alcohol? No. Does it kill as many people as cigarettes? No. Does it have as many deaths associated with it as aspirin overdose? No. (Carroll).''

While studies have shown a percentage of marijuana users to suffer from addiction to the drug, it is a small percentage of the population and an argument can be, and has been, made that anything can be addictive based on the emotional attachment a person has to an activity. The withdrawal period is far less severe than that of alcohol and other drugs. The NIDA has found that the average withdrawal begins after 1 day of abstinence, peaks at 2-3, and subsides after a week or two (NIDA).

As far as physical health effects, respiratory problems appear to be the only one that both sides agree on, but advocates of marijuana contend moderate use of the drug is less severe than cigarette use as cigarette users tend to smoke multiple cigarettes a day. Furthermore, alternative means of marijuana consumption such as eating it or using a vaporizer lower the amount of carcinogens that enter the lungs. Even more surprising, studies conducted in Italy and Britain have found that THC might be useful in fighting off bacteria (Fountain).

With the amount of studies that have been conducted on marijuana since the 1950s, and the nature of their findings, it is shocking as to why a collective conclusion has not yet been reached in regards to the legality issue of the substance. Based on the above information and the criteria established earlier for determining whether a substance should be controlled or not, we will systematically explore the ethical validity of a law prohibiting the use, growth, and sale of marijuana.

First, we must define the telos or function of a law. Certainly, most will agree that the function of a law is to protect the majority of the population from a dangerous element of society. If that is the function of a law then we must examine the societal effects of the illegalization of marijuana versus the potential dangers.

As a result of the prohibition of marijuana, millions of Americans have been arrested and entered into the justice system, with 872,721 people being arrested in 2007, 89% for simple possession (NORML). The number is a 5.2% increase from 2006, with the annual number of marijuana arrests rising steadily on a yearly basis (NORML).

The majority of people arrested for marijuana are non-violent offenders with no previous criminal record. This means they pose no threat to society. So what is the law protecting the population from? Themselves? This seems to be the case since the law has damaged more lives through legal troubles than it protected since most marijuana users do not use the substance and go on crime sprees.

If the law's function is meant to protect people from the health risks associated with the population then we must once again return to the studies conducted on the issue. While marijuana, like anything, has negative effects, it appears that overall it is no more dangerous than many legal substances such as alcohol, cigarettes, aspirin, etc. In the WebMD article, which talks about Igor Grant's research regarding the effects of marijuana on the brain, Lester Grinspoon, MD, a retired Harvard Medical School psychiatrist who studied medicinal marijuana use since the 1960s and wrote two books on the topic, says that while Grant's finding provide more evidence on its safety, “it's nothing that those of us who have been studying this haven't known for a very long time.”

“Marijuana is a remarkably safe and non-toxic drug that can effectively treat about 30 different conditions,” he tells WebMD. “I predict it will become the aspirin of the 21st century, as more people recognize this. (WebMD)”

While many credible minds in the scientific community warn about the dangers of marijuana use on people under the age of 18, the consensus seems to be that it is relatively safe to use for adults, especially when used in moderation.

If it poses little danger to a person's health, brings joy to those who use it, and its users are not prone to criminal behavior, what is the function of a law prohibiting marijuana? If, as a law, it is to protect the population from an assumed danger, is it serving that function? The answers to those questions are for the reader to determine based on the evidence and analysis presented within this paper, in addition to any evidence found independently.

Works Cited

Carroll, Linda. “Marijuana's Effects: More Than Munchies.” New York Times 22 Jan. 2008.

“872,721 marijuana arrests in 2007, up 5.2% from 2006.” NORML. 15 Sept. 2008. NORML. 22 Oct. 2008 .

Fountain, Henry. “Marijuana Ingredient May Fight Bacteria.” New York Times 5 Sept. 2008: F3.

“Info Facts - Marijuana.” National Institute of Drug Abuse. June 2008. National Institute of Drug Abuse. 22 Oct. 2008.

Kirchheimer, Sid. “Heavy Marijuana Use Doesn't Damage Brain.” WebMD. 1 July 2003. WebMD. 22 Oct. 2008 .

Pot is fun? by Li Indra

Where Not to Smoke Your Marijuana

Saturday, June 5th, 2010

A young Montana man who was mauled after he smoked marijuana and entered a pen to feed a grizzly bear at Great Bear Adventures Park where he worked was awarded workers' compensation benefits. “When it comes to attacking humans, grizzlies are equal opportunity maulers; attacking without regard to race, creed, ethnicity or marijuana usage,” Judge James Jeremiah Shea is quoted as saying in the Flathead Beacon. “Hopkins’ use of marijuana to kick off a day of working around grizzly bears was ill-advised to say the least and mind-bogglingly stupid to say the most. However, I have been presented with no evidence by which I can conclude that Hopkins’ marijuana use was the major contributing cause of the grizzly attack.” I wonder if this young man will know qualify for a medical marijuana card?

Should defendants in a trial be forced to take a drug test?  Read one take on the topic.

A quick search of the Internet results in thousands of sites promising to help people pass their drug tests. Certainly, with more and more companies testing employees and perspective employees for drugs, there is a huge market for products that will allegedly eliminate traces of illegal substances from urine. But many of these products either don’t work, or contain ingredients for which laboratories are also screening. In fact, the state of Texas forbids anyone from buying these kits online, and companies that sell these products refuse to ship to addresses in Texas.

Obviously, the best way to pass a drug test is to refrain from using any substances! But the reality is, millions of Americans are casual users of marijuana, and their performance on the job is not affected in any way. Still, their use of this drug can prevent them from being hired for a job, and can also result in their being terminated should a random drug test be conducted. Is there a way to successfully rid one’s body of evidence of marijuana prior to a drug test?

To answer that question, it is important to understand how these tests work and what they are designed to detect. Most drug tests are for THC (Tetrahydrocannabinol), which is the primary active ingredient in marijuana. THC is absorbed into the gastrointestinal tract and metabolizes quickly. It is stored in the fat cells and continues to be absorbed by the bloodstream for up to 30 days after ingestion. 

Urine picks up THC from the bloodstream, which is why most drug tests are conducted on urine. Many of the products being advertised to help people pass drug tests contain some type of herb. These may be effective in temporarily removing THC from your system, but are will do nothing to remove the THC from fat cells. For years, goldenseal has been touted as “sure thing” in terms of helping people pass drug tests. But studies have shown that even this herb has no affect on the stored THC.
While no method is guaranteed, many people have been able to pass drug tests by temporarily diluting their urine, thus reducing the concentration of THC. The most common way to do this is to drink a lot of water just prior to the test. While the belief persists that a person should start drinking water three days in advance, this is completely unnecessary. Plan on drinking eight glasses of water just before the test. This will reduce the levels of THC in the urine to a point where it may be undetectable.

While diluting the urine reduces THC levels, it will also alter the color of the urine. Testing labs have been keeping up with trends, and if a urine sample is too clear, it will certainly be singled out as suspect. Taking vitamin B-2 or B-12 will ensure the diluted urine will remain yellow.

Some labs also test for creatinine levels. Again, diluted urine will contain much lower levels of this substance, and this may also lead to questions. To boost creatinine levels, eat a lot of red meat or other protein rich foods during the three days prior to the test. Sexual activity is also thought to boost creatinine levels.

Exercise helps burn fat. However, exercising increases the THC levels in the bloodstream, so it is a good idea to stop exercising a week before the test is scheduled, allowing the anabolic process to begin, storing the fat.

On test day, make sure to urinate several times before giving the sample, and make sure the sample is taken from the middle of the urine stream, just enough to satisfy the requirement.

Some people try to alter their urine with chemicals and other household products. Most do not work, and those that do can alter the pH levels and render the test invalid. Here are some products that do not work, despite claims to the contrary:

-Ammonia (Alters pH level and has a noticeable odor)
-Blood (Has no affect)
-Drain (Turns urine blue!)
-Hydrogen Peroxide (Normal household strength does nothing)
-Lemon Juice (No affect)
-Dish Soap (Tests negative but may suds up!)
-Lemon juice (No affect)

Another method that will ensure negative test results is substituting urine from someone who is clean. Of course, this won’t work if someone is charged with monitoring the testing. The sample must be kept at body temperature, and concealed until the time of the testing. This is the least advisable method, however.

No method of altering or diluting urine is foolproof, and as new means are developed to trick the tests, labs are developing more sophisticated tests to identify these new substances. While the issue of drug testing in the workplace is a hot topic, the reality is that employers are using these tests and people who smoke marijuana are finding themselves increasingly more limited as to where they can work. The best advice is that, if you are looking for a job, it might be wise to refrain from using marijuana prior to beginning your job search.

marijuana-leaf by gecko.juice

Oaksterdam “U” Unionizes

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

Medical Marijuana-friendly Oakland California is working hard at bring in money by licensing, and taxingmedical cannabis growers. Meanwhile, Oaksterdam “U” which has over 100 employees voted on Friday (5/29/10) to unionize as part of a retail agriculture and community patient care union. The Local 5’s organizer Dan Rush stated that medical cannabis clubs ,medical marijuana doctors and the industry as a whole “will get the same respect as law enforcement, nurses, doctors” …. Rebecca Kaplan, Oakland City councilwoman and prospective contender for mayor, told CBS that the unionization was “a good day for Oakland,” the city of Oakland has an unemployment rate of over 17 %.

The Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010 - The Tax Cannabis 2010 Initiative would generate billions of tax revenue by legalizing marijuana. The Initiative could go on the California's 2010 ballot if enough voter signatures are collected. It proposes to tax and regulate marijuana similar to how alcohol is regulated and taxed.

The Initiative would “allow people 21 years old or older to possess, cultivate, and/or transport marijuana for personal use.” Each city/local government would be able to decide independently whether to tax and regulate the production and sale of marijuana. Other key aspects of the Initiative include: prohibiting possession of marijuana on school grounds, public use, or smoking it while minors are present. It maintains current prohibitions against driving while impaired and outlines serious punishment for anyone providing marijuana to those under 21 years of age.

Benefits
Legalizing marijuana would benefit States by providing much needed tax revenue. Take the profit from the underground and untaxed and place it in the hand of government to support libraries, schools, roads, police, firefighters, etc. An immense amount of money and resources would be saved. Prison would be reserved for serious offenders and probation officers could devote more time to serious probation and parole violations.

If passed, the Tax Cannabis 2010 Initiative would create contractor jobs as regulated stores open to market marijuana products. Regulation would make marijuana safer. To avoid the negative effects of smoking, marijuana can be ingested by drinking, eating or taking a pill! Vaporizers could be sold as a safer alternative to smoking. It eliminates tar and other harmful chemicals and emits very little second-hand smoke.

Facts
46% of Americans favor legalizing marijuana for personal use, according to a Views on Legalizing Marijuana polls from ABC News/Washington Post and Time/CNN.

56% of California voters support legalizing marijuana and taxing its sale, according to The Field Poll.

A number of U.S. cities have already changed prosecution priorities making adult marijuana possession for personal use their lowest priority.

Marijuana possession of up to one ounce is currently punishable with a fine of only $100 in California.

Massachusetts Joint Committee on Revenue held a public hearing October 14, 2009 on H2929, An Act to Tax and Regulate the Cannabis Industry. Richard Evans provided notes on the hearing.

The Federal laws on marijuana have little to do with a state decision regarding legalizing marijuana. The Feds only get involved in high-profile marijuana offenses.

Only 434,000 signatures of registered California voters are needed to qualify the Tax Cannabis 2010 Initiative for the November 2010 ballot. Richard Lee, the founder of the Oaksterdam University, in Oakland, California, is backed by former State Senate President Don Perata. Lee has already collected 25% of the needed 434,000 signatures, and he has pledged to spend $1 million of his own money to support the Tax Cannabis 2010 Initiative!

California
California has been known for setting standards in America and most of its residents recognize that a time for change has presented itself. The state is closer to passing the 2010 ballot since medicinal marijuana laws passed over a decade ago, in 1996. Medical marijuana advocates in California are not opposed to taxing the sale of medicinal or legalized marijuana sales. They understand the benefits legalizing marijuana would have for their great state.

Most residents of Oakland, California recognize the benefits their city would reap from legalizing marijuana to tax and regulate sales. “The new tax revenue will help save libraries, parks, and other public services, and that the once destitute area where Oaksterdam now thrives has seen a clear boost,” City Council member Rebecca Kaplan told Newsweek. Medical marijuana in smokeable and edible variations, sold at competitive prices, is available in Oaksterdam at multiple cafes, clubs and patient dispensaries.

Personal views on marijuana
Erin, my neighbor and mother of two, said she would be more comfortable with her kids smoking marijuana than getting drunk. Erin worries about the loss of inhibitions experienced with drinking. Erin recalls doing things she normally wouldn't do while drunk but never doing anything she wouldn't normally do after smoking marijuana. I tend to agree. I also know many doctors who would prefer marijuana over alcohol. In my experience, marijuana users are nonviolent as opposed to alcohol - a legal, highly addictive drug. Drinking often leads to brutal bar or spousal fights or people getting behind the wheel without understanding how impaired they are and take someone's life.

I purport the days of work missed by the alcoholic are much more than that of the chronic marijuana smoker. There is opposition to this point of view but I disagree. I believe in essence, most everything in life that is done in excess has negative effects.

Marijuana is said to be a gateway drug. Is this true or is it political propaganda? I believe it is the latter and found no supporting research. I have seen serious negative effects of heroine users, i.e. stealing, breaking and entering, to get money to support their habit. I have not seen this with alcohol or marijuana users or abusers.

I challenge anyone reading this to offer opposing views on why marijuana should not be legalized. It is legal for medicinal purposes in 13 states. There is a host of indications for the use of medical marijuana; over 250 to be exact. Why are prescription drugs handed out like candy while marijuana, with proven efficacy, remains completely illegal in most states? My answer - politics! Regardless of legality, marijuana is available for those who know the right people; prohibition doesn't work. The law does not stop them from purchasing it. Legalizing marijuana has serious benefits for cities and states through tax revenue and I do not understand why politicians do not get it.

Let's look at the Netherlands as an example
Hard drugs versus soft drugs: Holland differentiates “Hard drugs are those such as cocaine, ecstasy and heroin. Soft drugs are those such as marijuana and psychedelic mushrooms.” Here is a statistic that may surprise those who think legalizing marijuana will lead to increased use - Marijuana use in the Netherlands is lower than in many other European countries and a lot lower than the United States. In Holland, only 6% of had used marijuana in the past year, compared to 11% in the U.S.! The Dutch Ministry of Justice reports that the Nederweit industry (aka Netherlands weed) employs approximately 20,000 people. I found no negative criminal repercussions, such as increased crime activity. Even though marijuana is legal in the Netherlands, there is still an underground marijuana market.

List of Sources:
The Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010, Tax & Regulate Cannabis California 2010

Changing Views on Social Issues: Allemande Left. Allemande Right, ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: HOT-BUTTON ISSUES

Mervin Field, The Independent and Non-Partisan Survey of Public Opinion Established in 1947 as the California Poll, The Field Poll

Ranee Wright, Massachusetts Act to Tax and Regulate Cannabis, Associated Content

Richard Evans, Notes, Materials on Cannabis Taxation & Regulation

Oaksterdam University Faculty Oakland, Oaksterdam University

Jennifer Molina, Welcome to Potopia, Newsweek

Oaksterdam,
Wikipedia

13 Legal Medical Marijuana States, ProCon.org

Marijuana and Dutch Law, Amsterdam Review

If Marijuana Is Legal, Will Addiction Rise?, The New York Times

Should the U.S. Legalize Marijuana?, Opposing Views

Willie Nelson smoking marijuana by qdoublep

Cannabis … is it addictive?

Friday, May 14th, 2010

Cannabis is not physically addictive, regardless of what many anti-marijuana people want us to accept as true. Marijuana consumers can use marijuana frequently, even numerous times daily, without any problem giving it up, when necessary.

Cannabis has the lowest risk of dependence and withdrawal potential if you compare it to other substances, such as alcohol, opiates (like Vicodin), caffeine, and other psychoactive drugs. Many of the anti-depressants (currently being prescribed abundantly) have very severe physical withdrawal symptoms which most patients are not warned about.

Marijuana is illegal, but should it be? That is a question that remains unanswered. The road to the illegalization of marijuana began in 1937 when the Marihuana Tax Act was passed. While it didn't make the drug illegal, it made it very dangerous to deal with the substance. It wasn't until the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 that marijuana became a schedule 1 narcotic, making it illegal. In order to be declared a schedule 1 narcotic, a substance must meet the following criteria:

(A) The drug or other substance has high potential for abuse.

(B) The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.

(C) There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision.

In this paper we will explore the function of drug laws, how that function relates to marijuana, and whether or not a law prohibiting marijuana is ethical and fair. In addition to the guidelines offered by the CSA, we will include our own reasons for controlling a substance, which are:

(A) The drug induces severe psychological affects, which cause unpredictable behavior that may endanger the user and those around them.

(B) Use of the drug could lead to crime.

(C) Use of the drug can lead to severe health problems.

The opposition to marijuana (in the modern day) stems largely from fears in regards to the possible psychological and physical health effects of the drug. Some claim that marijuana causes permanent damage to brain, hindering a person's cognitive skills over time. Others note personality changes such as loss of motivation, paranoia, and addiction.

Studies have shown the fears regarding personality to be justified. However, the general consensus is that the people most affected by marijuana in terms of addiction and personality changes, are people who began using the drug before the age of 18, a period in a child's life that is important to their psychological and social development. In fact, 10-14% of marijuana users suffer from addiction problems and withdrawal that is comparable to nicotine withdrawal, says University of Vermont associate professor and director of its Treatment Research Center, Dr. Alan J. Budney (Carroll).

According to the National Institute for Drug Abuse (NIDA) marijuana can have lasting effects on a user's daily life. The following is taken from NIDA's information page of marijuana:

Research clearly demonstrates that marijuana has the potential to cause problems in daily life or make a person's existing problems worse. In one study, heavy marijuana abusers reported that the drug impaired several important measures of life achievement including physical and mental health, cognitive abilities, social life, and career status. Several studies associate workers' marijuana smoking with increased absences, tardiness, accidents, workers' compensation claims, and job turnover.

As for physiological health effects, the three main concerns are in regards to the brain, the heart, and the lungs. As mentioned earlier, many opponents to marijuana use claim that the drug causes permanent damage to the brain. Many studies dispute this notion, but we will cover that in more depth when we get to the pro-marijuana portion of this paper. Instead, we will focus on the areas in which scientific studies have been able to confirm potential health risks.

Research has shown that the risk for a heart-attack increases within the first hour of marijuana use. This happens because of an increase in blood pressure and heart rate. In addition to heart concerns, marijuana poses a threat to the respiratory system as it is carcinogenic and users tend to hold smoke in their lungs longer. While it was originally believed that marijuana smoke caused cancer new studies have proven otherwise, some even saying that the active ingredient in cannabis, THC, may be able to help prevent certain kinds of cancer (NIDA).

Nevertheless, the debate on medicinal marijuana has caused an increase in the amount of research regarding the drug, many of which have ended with surprising conclusions. In 15 different studies, varying from 3 months to 13+ years, scientists observed regular marijuana users and non-users to determine if there was any damage to the brain as a result of use. All of the studies conclusively proved that marijuana does not damage the brain permanently as previously believed. Other studies have produced similar results (WebMD).

Igor Grant, MD and lead researcher for the previously mentioned studies makes sure to mention that the participants were all adults and that the results would most likely be different if it was a 12 year old user, whose nervous system is still developing (WebMD).

In regards to addiction, ''Everything is relative,'' said Dr. Donald Jasinksi, a professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins medical school and director of the Center for Chemical Dependence at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center. ''Does it destroy as many lives as alcohol? No. Does it kill as many people as cigarettes? No. Does it have as many deaths associated with it as aspirin overdose? No. (Carroll).''

While studies have shown a percentage of marijuana users to suffer from addiction to the drug, it is a small percentage of the population and an argument can be, and has been, made that anything can be addictive based on the emotional attachment a person has to an activity. The withdrawal period is far less severe than that of alcohol and other drugs. The NIDA has found that the average withdrawal begins after 1 day of abstinence, peaks at 2-3, and subsides after a week or two (NIDA).

As far as physical health effects, respiratory problems appear to be the only one that both sides agree on, but advocates of marijuana contend moderate use of the drug is less severe than cigarette use as cigarette users tend to smoke multiple cigarettes a day. Furthermore, alternative means of marijuana consumption such as eating it or using a vaporizer lower the amount of carcinogens that enter the lungs. Even more surprising, studies conducted in Italy and Britain have found that THC might be useful in fighting off bacteria (Fountain).

With the amount of studies that have been conducted on marijuana since the 1950s, and the nature of their findings, it is shocking as to why a collective conclusion has not yet been reached in regards to the legality issue of the substance. Based on the above information and the criteria established earlier for determining whether a substance should be controlled or not, we will systematically explore the ethical validity of a law prohibiting the use, growth, and sale of marijuana.

First, we must define the telos or function of a law. Certainly, most will agree that the function of a law is to protect the majority of the population from a dangerous element of society. If that is the function of a law then we must examine the societal effects of the illegalization of marijuana versus the potential dangers.

As a result of the prohibition of marijuana, millions of Americans have been arrested and entered into the justice system, with 872,721 people being arrested in 2007, 89% for simple possession (NORML). The number is a 5.2% increase from 2006, with the annual number of marijuana arrests rising steadily on a yearly basis (NORML).

The majority of people arrested for marijuana are non-violent offenders with no previous criminal record. This means they pose no threat to society. So what is the law protecting the population from? Themselves? This seems to be the case since the law has damaged more lives through legal troubles than it protected since most marijuana users do not use the substance and go on crime sprees.

If the law's function is meant to protect people from the health risks associated with the population then we must once again return to the studies conducted on the issue. While marijuana, like anything, has negative effects, it appears that overall it is no more dangerous than many legal substances such as alcohol, cigarettes, aspirin, etc. In the WebMD article, which talks about Igor Grant's research regarding the effects of marijuana on the brain, Lester Grinspoon, MD, a retired Harvard Medical School psychiatrist who studied medicinal marijuana use since the 1960s and wrote two books on the topic, says that while Grant's finding provide more evidence on its safety, “it's nothing that those of us who have been studying this haven't known for a very long time.”

“Marijuana is a remarkably safe and non-toxic drug that can effectively treat about 30 different conditions,” he tells WebMD. “I predict it will become the aspirin of the 21st century, as more people recognize this. (WebMD)”

While many credible minds in the scientific community warn about the dangers of marijuana use on people under the age of 18, the consensus seems to be that it is relatively safe to use for adults, especially when used in moderation.

If it poses little danger to a person's health, brings joy to those who use it, and its users are not prone to criminal behavior, what is the function of a law prohibiting marijuana? If, as a law, it is to protect the population from an assumed danger, is it serving that function? The answers to those questions are for the reader to determine based on the evidence and analysis presented within this paper, in addition to any evidence found independently.

Works Cited

Carroll, Linda. “Marijuana's Effects: More Than Munchies.” New York Times 22 Jan. 2008.

“872,721 marijuana arrests in 2007, up 5.2% from 2006.” NORML. 15 Sept. 2008. NORML. 22 Oct. 2008 .

Fountain, Henry. “Marijuana Ingredient May Fight Bacteria.” New York Times 5 Sept. 2008: F3.

“Info Facts - Marijuana.” National Institute of Drug Abuse. June 2008. National Institute of Drug Abuse. 22 Oct. 2008.

Kirchheimer, Sid. “Heavy Marijuana Use Doesn't Damage Brain.” WebMD. 1 July 2003. WebMD. 22 Oct. 2008 .

Global Marijuana March, Toronto, Canada by tysonwilliams.com

Over The Counter Prescription Drugs Vs. Medical Marijuana

Monday, May 10th, 2010

The National debate concerning the legalization of of medical cannabis, continues to be a hot topic…and not just the general public. Within the Facebook community the groups such as “Moms for Marijuana” and “Baby Boomers for Medical Marijuana” have as their principal ambition educating people, testing the predetermined ideas and battling the lack of knowledge with the only effectual weapon… Knowledge! As medical cannabis gains national acceptance as an alternative medication for many ailments, medical marijuana will gain its rightful place in the medicine cabinets of America.

A topic of invention in which one refers back to general events in the past or to what we can safely suppose will occur in the future based on proof from the past is referred to as common topic of past/future fact (Rhetoricae, 2009). Another commonly used term, as described in Sharon Crowley and Debra Hawhees' text, “Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students,” is common topic of conjecture. By using Aristotle's Topical System I was able to find out a lot of valuable proofs and information regarding medical marijuana use and their dispensaries in Colorado. More specifically, using the common topic of conjecture which answers the following questions: What exists? What does not exist? What is the size or extent of what exists? Did it exist in the past? Will it exist in the future? (Crowley & Hawhee, 2009) The following essay will explore these five statements of conjecture regarding the issue or marijuana in the state of Colorado.

When considering what exists in Colorado, in terms of medical marijuana, one could consult the information given in Amendment 20, passed November of 2000 where Colorado voters effectively legalized medical marijuana. Amendment 20 approves marijuana as a safe and effective medicine for people with: debilitating medical conditions including cancer, glaucoma, HIV/AIDS and also in treating cachexia, severe pain, severe nausea, seizures characteristic of epilepsy, muscle spasms characteristic of multiple sclerosis, and other medical conditions approved by the state health agency (Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, 2009). Amendment 20 also states that anyone may petition “the Registry” to add a condition. The registry created by the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment confidentially maintains patients who have applied and are entitled to receive a registry identification card (Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, 2009).

Other regulations in place include the application process, which includes a cost of $90 a year. Any patient with a valid registry card may legally use marijuana for medicinal purposes and their caregiver, if one should exist, may assist them in doing so (Rhetoricae, 2009). Although regulations and rules for medical marijuana do exist here in Colorado, there is still the question of what doesn't exist in Colorado. One thing that doesn't exist is legal distribution of marijuana for non medical reasons. Taxation also doesn't exist for marijuana laws in Colorado, or in any other state.

Debates on marijuana extend beyond just Colorado laws; this situation expands out to all states. It has been said that replacing marijuana prohibition with a system of taxation and regulation similar to that used for alcoholic beverages would produce combined savings and tax revenues of between $10 billion and $14 billion per year,. This was found out in a June 2005 report done by Dr. Jeffrey Miron, and backed by more than 500 distinguished economists (Marijuana Policy Project, 2005).

More recently and specifically, it is estimated medical marijuana dispensaries could generate up to $15 million for Colorado state and up to $45 million in city and community taxes through the 3.62% city sales tax of medical marijuana dispensaries (Chapin, 2009). Even knowing that laws for marijuana haven't always existed; we can tell from recent events that more laws and regulations will be set in place. Senator Chris Romer plans to introduce comprehensive medical marijuana legislation in the nest Colorado General Assembly, which begins in January 2010 (Chapin, 2009). Coloradans, and others, are in favor of taxation on medical marijuana; not only to legitimize the practice but to clean up the industry in general. Put differently, if marijuana were legalized it
wouldn't be seen as such a negative practice, similar to how alcohol is legal and has set taxes and regulations.

With important dates set in January the future is already set in motion. There is a future in the laws of marijuana and starting in the new year they will unfold. Maybe Colorado will be an example state for others to follow in the near future.

References

Chapin, L. (November 23, 2009). Colorado Could Become First State to Regulate and Tax Medical Marijuana. Retrieved December 8, 2009 from www.usnews.com

Crowley, S. & Hawhee, D. (2009). Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students 4th Edition. Pearson Publication, Inc.

Rhetoricae, S. (2009) Common Topics of Invention: Circumstances. Retrieved December 19, 2009 from http://rhetoric.byu.edu/

Marijuana Crop in Crittenden County, Kentucky, 1942 by The Nite Tripper

Los Angeles Medical Marijuana Collectives…Smoked by City Council

Saturday, May 8th, 2010

L.A. 420 Collective News! More than 400 Medical Cannabis Dispensaries in the County of Los Angeles were notified toclose up shop before June 7, 2010. Will shop keepers decide to fight theletters sent by the city council to let their shops go up in smoke?

The “official” decision to go against social progress is not likely to bode well for city officials. After all the great work celebs and Ca. residents have done to de-stigmatize medicinal marijuana as a natural remedy alternative for so many costly pharmaceuticals, this is distressing news for many “going green” Americans.

Author Jonah Raskin labored on an organic farm in Sonoma, California, to write his new book Field Days: A Year of Farming, Eating, and Drinking Wine in California. He commingles his reporter's notes with personal memoir in this quest for “health, harmony, and a sense of place.” The journey transforms him into a slimmer, near-vegetarian locavore. He comes to understand that the key to sustainability is to eat food raised close to home and grown organically.

Raskin says, “I did not intend this book to be about politics or economics.” That is a concept so quaint as to be humorous. The only thing more political than the issues of farming, organic food production and environmental sustainability is Karl Rove's Blackberry. No matter how delicately Raskin wants to tiptoe around politics or economics, he is discussing Mexican farm labor within 22 pages, California land value within 31 pages and soon thereafter, farm collectives, food co-ops, agribusiness, Community Supported Agriculture (CSA), the Department of Homeland Security, labor raids, pesticides and other such socio-economic considerations. Raskin is no stranger to political topics. He reported extensively on California's marijuana cultivation business throughout the 1970s and he has written books on such incendiary figures as Abbie Hoffman and Alan Ginsberg. In spite of Raskin's non-political intent, he states (at least twice) throughout his book, “I believe that the hands on the hoes in the fields are connected to the hand on the knives and the forks at the dinner table.” Not exactly destined for a bumper sticker, however it does capsulate a world view.

In Field Days, Raskin presents himself as a skilled note taker rather than a brilliant wordsmith. He knows his strengths and weaknesses. He displays no false modesty when he says, “I never do know how to use the terms that wine writers use, though I have written about wine and wineries for magazines since the 1980s.” He demonstrates the point by rather feebly describing a boutique Zinfandel as “amazing” and moving on. Raskin's book reads like assiduous notes more or less randomly fleshed out. There is no unifying narrative thread to follow, no dramatic arc to travel. The many Somona residents who populate Field Days have personalities, but we learn too little about them to have an emotional stake in their outcome. We are still being introduced to new people on the fourth to last page. This is a bit of a ramble, but rambles can be enjoyable.

Raskin frequently is possessed to describe the clothing of his interview subjects and the impulse is entirely baffling, as the attire is never more remarkable than jeans, t-shirt and a baseball cap. Unless your subject is wearing leotards, a cape and a mask, it probably isn't worth mentioning. While this type of empty calorie detail is served, we are often left begging for more nourishing information at other passages in the book. For example, Raskin interviewed a farmer who “kept a record of the compost he added to the soil, and about compost he spoke rapturously. From the way he described its texture, color, smell, and weight, you might think compost was the food of the gods.” And that's it. Nothing more about that rapturous description. Just nouns, the bare bones. No adjectives, no similes, no spice. How would we think compost was the food of the gods with nothing more to incite our imagination? Come on, give us something to develop that manna-like texture, color, smell and weight. We can take it.

On a substantive level, Raskin may be a bit light-headed and heavy-handed on the topic of locally grown and consumed produce. The most glaring example is his approach to the Whole Foods market chain. We are told that Whole Foods is an evil corporate giant to be shunned. However, we are never actually told why. From his interviews, the employees seem happy, the executives seem committed. Raskin is given access to all aspects of the Sonoma Whole Foods store with the exception of the kitchen for safety considerations, but for that hindrance Raskin insists Whole Foods is not to be trusted. He appears to have forgotten mentioning 200 pages earlier that Whole Foods loaned a Sonoma organic farmer $50,000, with which she installed an elaborate underground irrigation system, as part of the company's “program to rely less on distant suppliers and generate more produce from local farmers.” This doesn't sound the least bit evil or corporate. In fact, it sounds quite compatable with Raskin's “hands on the hoes” sensibility. Yet, we are told absolutely nothing more about this sponsorship program. Remember, this is a personal quest and not investigative journalism. Field Days is best appreciated when held to this less demanding standard.

Raskin's personal quest is what is important here. “Going back to the soil–planting, harvesting, weeding, and cultivating–changed what I prepared in my kitchen and how I prepared it,” he observes. “Farming changed my feelings about food any my rituals of eating, whether by myself or with friends.” If it takes a ramble to reach this most admirable end, so be it. Enjoy the ramble.

Field Days: A Year of Farming, Eating, and Drinking Wine in California
By Jonah Raskin
University of California Press, 329 pages, $24.95 hardcover

Marijuana Rally 2007-09-15 20 by thivierr

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!